The Delphi Murders – Update 05/19/2017

RSo, I’ve noticed that traffic has picked up on this blog a lot since I made a few posts about the murders of Libby German and Abby Williams in Delphi, IN.  That’s great–it’s good to see that many are still interested in the case, and I’m happy to be able to help keep awareness raised in my own small way.

Sadly, the term “update” as used in the title is a bit of a misnomer.  We are now over three months past the date of the murders and as of the posting of this article, the police are no closer to finding the suspect/killer (or suspects/killers–we still don’t know who did what when, or how many there were when that what was done) responsible.

Much surrounding the case has happened in these three months:

  • Fundraisers at a local Delphi tavern to help build a memorial softball park for the girls
  • A solidarity hike on the trail from which the girls disappeared to show that the residents of Delphi are not afraid
  • Nights during which orange porch lights are lit

But that’s precisely the problem.  Much surrounding the case has occurred, but nothing that advances the case has occurred (at least, nothing that’s been reported).

Due to this void of new developments/details, speculation is starting to run wild:

  • Internet sleuths are arguing about the path the killer (or killers, because again, we don’t know how many and apparently the police don’t, either) took to Ron Logan’s property.  Did he go through the woods?  Did he cross the creek?  At this point, both are feasible, both are possible, and whichever is correct doesn’t really matter unless the killer dropped his ID or a name tag or something on his way, because neither possibility brings us closer to closure on this case.
  • YouTube detectives are left to sort, resort, examine, and re-examine the same three second audio clip and the same two or three still images from a video clip that apparently exists but hasn’t been released to the public.  Does the suspect have a gait?  Is the suspect wearing a hood or sunglasses?  It’s impossible to tell from three grainy still frame images, and the suspect sounds like every other southern Indiana native (or southern Ohio native…or southern any-state native, for that matter).
  • Spiritualists, mediums, and paranormal scholars are attempting to rationalize motive or contact the girls through EVP sessions, Ouija boards, and seances.  Sadly, we’re about as likely to get anywhere with those as we are with re-examining the same paltry pieces of evidence we’ve been allowed to see thus far.

Don’t misunderstand me.  I applaud those who are putting in the time and effort to do any or all of the above, and more.  But I say that knowing that all of this is nothing more than a way to distract ourselves while we wait for…something to happen.

Anything to happen.

None of this speculation brings us closer to the ultimate goal of solving this case.

We want to help.  People want to help.  We want this monster (or these monsters) caught and brought to justice.  But as we get chronologically further from the crime, we are getting closer to cold case territory.  I don’t want that to happen.  Internet sleuths, YouTube personalities, occultists, the people of Delphi, and the families of the victims–they don’t want that to happen, either.  No one wants that to happen except for the killer(s), because that will mean he/they got away with it.

And so this is my point:

The police of Delphi, IN must release more information.  They are keeping the details of this case close to the vest, and that’s understandable–the last thing a police force investigating a double homicide of children needs is a phone line filled with nut jobs claiming to have heard the name of the killer from a jar of Skippy.  But the tip they say they so desperately need has a better chance of coming if we (“we” being the public, the people who want so desperately to find those responsible) know just a little bit more.

And when I say a little, I mean a little.  I don’t need to know how Libby and Abby died.  I can go the rest of my life not knowing those details and find myself better off because of it.

But I do need to know if the man in the still frame images has a gait or a limp.  I do need to know if he’s wearing a hood or sunglasses.  Do you know what might tell me that?  A few seconds of the clip itself.  Someone out there knows who this guy is, and might even think the man in the still frame images looks oddly familiar–but because they don’t see the body language, they aren’t making the connection.  Isn’t that how suspects in robbery cases are found and arrested, where the best images that exist are from grainy CCTV footage?  We need to see this guy move.

We also need to hear more of this guy’s speech patterns.  Perhaps there’s nothing peculiar or noteworthy about the way he speaks; perhaps he just sounds like a normal yokel from the south of any given state in the U.S.  But perhaps he doesn’t.  Perhaps he pronounces a single word in a distinctive matter–maybe he enunciates his Ts more than would be considered normal, or maybe he has a slight stutter, or maybe he pauses in strange places.  None of us can tell from three seconds of audio where he says, “G’down the hill.”  Again, I can imagine a scenario where perhaps someone recognizes the voice but doesn’t realize it yet–and any unique qualities present in the suspect’s speech might be the trigger needed to make this person put two and two together.

Now, it is possible that the reason we haven’t received more audio is because the audio that remains is either considered to be too muffled, or possibly too disturbing–containing, perhaps, the girls crying or pleading.  In the case of the former, I err on the side of releasing it anyway, as the right person may glean the right things from that otherwise muffled audio and help solve this crime.  In the case of the latter…well, as difficult as it might be, I say release it anyway.  This is a disturbing crime, and we don’t even have all of the details yet.  If someone has been willingly protecting this monster and hasn’t yet been convinced to turn him in with a quarter of a million dollar reward and the pleas of the surviving family members, maybe facing that disturbing audio will encourage them to finally do the right thing.

Of course, this is all mere speculation; I don’t know why we haven’t been given more audio by now.  Or video, for that matter.

In closing, there’s such a thing as keeping details too close to the vest.  People want to help solve this case, but we can’t do that without more (basic) information.  Show us a clip.  Let’s see the monster move.  Play more audio.  Let’s hear this animal bark.  I don’t think what I’ve suggested in this post is extraordinary.  I don’t think we need more details of the case as such.  We just need more details regarding the suspect.  That’s the only way the public can and will have the best chance of dropping the tip necessary to close this case in a timely fashion.  Libby German had enough presence of mind to film and record the suspect.  It would be an atrocity if that effort were in vain because a decision-maker arbitrarily decided against using that information to the fullest.


10 thoughts on “The Delphi Murders – Update 05/19/2017

  1. Sometimes I wonder if the police even want cases like this solved. Look at the Maura Murray case. It’s been 13 years and we still don’t know any of the evidence they have hidden close to the chest. Maybe the friggin public can help! The public solves most crimes anyway. Letting out a few details would not hurt the integrity of this case. The only way I think it would is if law enforcement was involved. And even then, letting out a few details wouldn’t hurt. If there are firm clues, the integrity would definitely not be compromised. Maybe they don’t want us to solve it, that’s why. I


    • I truly don’t understand the rationale behind it. I’ve received a Facebook message from some unknown person (presumably in the know) that the police have a suspect/know who did it but are constant bunglers and so can’t prove anything–but even then, my point still stands. Whether they don’t know or do but can’t prove it, release more information couldn’t hurt the case at this point.


  2. Whether they don’t know or do but can’t prove it, release more information couldn’t hurt the case at this point. Letting out a few details would not hurt the integrity of this case.


    • Couldn’t agree more. The sketch they released a couple of weeks ago is just what the doctor ordered, though. Such a clear, detailed sketch. If the public can’t help the investigation along now that that’s been released…then I don’t know what more the police can do, honestly. A video clip might be the last resort, but it would only help if the suspect walks oddly or something. Maybe more audio, but…damn, that’s a good sketch.


  3. It would be nice to know if they have substantial DNA or not. What about scrapings from under the girls’ finger nails. Tell us something! How is that going to compromise the case? Just like the cousins in Iowa, this case could go cold. And we don’t have any details in that case either. Do they really want these cases solved or what? Reminds me of Maura Murray, 13 years later and we still don’t know the details of her disappearance or what evidence the police are sitting on!


    • While I agree from a standpoint of curiosity, the main difference is that we know there’s a suspect here, and we now know what he looks like in some great detail. Knowing whether or not the police have DNA evidence isn’t going to help someone who knows this guy give the tip that solves this case. Would it be nice to know? Yes. Would it jeopardize their investigation? I don’t see how, no. Is it information necessary for us to help? Absolutely not.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s